Interviews.chat vs LastRound AI: 2026 Comparison

Interviews.chat and LastRound AI both offer a live copilot during interviews plus tools to prepare beforehand. The overlap mostly ends there. Interviews.chat is built around flexibility: choose your AI model, use it in the browser with no install, and pay a flat rate once you outgrow the credit system. LastRound AI is built around one specific problem, keeping the copilot invisible when the interviewer's screen-sharing software is active, and bundling that with structured practice across behavioral, coding, and system design formats.

Both are legitimate options. Which one fits depends on what your interview format actually looks like and whether visibility during a screen share is something you need to plan around.

What Interviews.chat is

Interviews.chat runs primarily in the browser, with an optional Chrome extension and a desktop app the site describes for use with meeting apps, working with Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. The Copilot listens quietly in the background, generating live suggestions and transcription without joining the meeting or notifying anyone, so it never shows up as a participant.

Its standout feature is the ability to compare answers across GPT, Claude, and Gemini rather than being locked into one model. Pricing, per Interviews.chat's pricing page, runs $19/mo for 1,000 credits (Starter), $29/mo for unlimited use (Booster), or $69/quarter for the same unlimited access (Pro), after a 30-credit free trial with no card required.

What LastRound AI is

LastRound AI is a desktop-first interview copilot for Windows and macOS. The overlay is designed to stay out of the screen-capture stream that Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet transmit to other participants, so it doesn't appear when you share your screen. That stealth behavior is included at the $19/mo Starter plan (90 credits/mo); there's no separate add-on tier for it. Response latency runs under 200ms. The product also includes voice mock interview practice across behavioral, coding, and system design formats, plus a resume builder with ATS scoring. The free plan gives 15 credits every month that reset monthly.

Interviews.chat vs LastRound AI: side by side

Model choice vs. stealth: the core trade-off

Interviews.chat's multi-model access is a genuine, hard-to-find feature. Being able to see how GPT, Claude, and Gemini each handle the same question, live, during a call, gives you a second opinion most single-model tools don't offer. If you've ever noticed one model give a cleaner system design answer than another, this matters.

LastRound AI doesn't offer that kind of model comparison. What it offers instead is an overlay specifically engineered to be excluded from the screen-capture stream during a live share, at no extra cost above the base $19/mo plan. For a phone screen or a webcam-only interview, that distinction is mostly irrelevant, since there's no screen to share in the first place. For a live coding round where you're sharing an IDE, it's the difference between the copilot being usable and the copilot being a liability.

Pricing structure

Both products enter at $19/mo, which makes the comparison unusually direct. Interviews.chat's $19 buys 1,000 credits and the option to scale to an unlimited plan at $29/mo or $69/quarter. LastRound AI's $19 buys 90 credits and includes stealth as part of the same plan, with no unlimited tier published at this time. Neither structure is objectively better. It depends on whether your priority is usage volume and model flexibility, or invisibility during screen sharing.

Interview format coverage

Interviews.chat covers virtual interviews, phone screens, online assessments including coding and whiteboard formats, and mock interviews with follow-up questions, plus career tools like resume generation and cover letter creation. LastRound AI covers behavioral, coding, and system design specifically, with voice-based mock practice and a resume builder that includes ATS scoring in the same tier. The two feature sets overlap more than they differ. The meaningful split is in what happens the moment a screen gets shared.

Pick Interviews.chat if…

• You want to compare AI models live. GPT, Claude, and Gemini side by side is not something most competitors offer.
• You don't need to hide from screen sharing. Phone screens, webcam-only rounds, or interviews where you're never sharing your screen make the stealth gap irrelevant.
• You want to try it with zero setup. The web-based option means no install and a quick start.
• You're doing a high volume of interviews. The $29/mo flat unlimited tier is a strong deal for a busy search.

Pick LastRound AI if…

• You're sharing your screen during technical rounds. Coding and whiteboard interviews where you share an IDE or a canvas are exactly where stealth matters most.
• You want stealth included, not sold separately. It's part of the $19/mo Starter plan.
• You want structured practice before the real thing. Voice mock interviews across behavioral, coding, and system design formats are built in.
• You're on Windows or Mac and want a native app. LastRound AI ships a desktop app for both.

Frequently asked questions

The bottom line

Neither tool is strictly better. Interviews.chat's multi-model access and flat $29/mo unlimited tier make it a strong pick for candidates who don't need screen-share invisibility, and its no-install web option lowers the barrier to trying it. LastRound AI's advantage is narrower but sharper: stealth built into the base $19/mo plan, plus mock interview practice and resume tools purpose-built around the interview itself.

If your interviews involve sharing your screen for coding or system design, that's the deciding factor. The LastRound AI interview copilot is built around exactly that scenario. For the wider list of tools in this category, see the Interviews.chat alternatives page.